acm - an acm publication


Cellular number portability
really such a big deal?

Ubiquity, Volume 2003 Issue November, November 1- November 30, 2003 | BY Kenneth G. Robinson 


Full citation in the ACM Digital Library  | PDF

The FCC ruling on number portability may have little effect on an already competitive market. | 526: Invalid SSL certificate

Error 526 Ray ID: 539ad0e61b39f060 • 2019-11-22 12:13:12 UTC

Invalid SSL certificate








What happened?

The origin web server does not have a valid SSL certificate.

What can I do?

If you're a visitor of this website:

Please try again in a few minutes.

If you're the owner of this website:

The SSL certificate presented by the server did not pass validation. This could indicate an expired SSL certificate or a certificate that does not include the requested domain name. Please contact your hosting provider to ensure that an up-to-date and valid SSL certificate issued by a Certificate Authority is configured for this domain name on the origin server. Additional troubleshooting information here.


ou manage statistics - I'm trying to manage home finances. AT&T offers 'wireless home phones'. I've had a wired line for 25 years and the monthly cost is approximately $60. The wireless offer with enhanced features and service for $20 per month. The phone number will remain the same. If I switch to wireless, my home phone number is (by law) no longer allowed to be in the local directory. I'm mad about this restriction. The FCC is painting the rules with a too-broad brush. Provisions should have been made for me (a consumer)to elect his own destiny and risk tolerance. A directory listing should be optional to free Americans.

��� Lenny Harrett, Thu, 29 Nov 2012 12:15:54 UTC

Leave this field empty